Your privacy, your choice

We use essential cookies to make sure the site can function. We also use optional cookies for advertising, personalisation of content, usage analysis, and social media.

By accepting optional cookies, you consent to the processing of your personal data - including transfers to third parties. Some third parties are outside of the European Economic Area, with varying standards of data protection.

See our privacy policy for more information on the use of your personal data.

for further information and to change your choices.

Skip to main content

Table 4 Percentage of posts with violations by neighborhood and dispensary characteristics

From: Analysis of social media compliance with cannabis advertising regulations: evidence from recreational dispensaries in Illinois 1-year post-legalization

 

Any violation

Appealing to youth

Health claim

Other violations

Percentage Black or Hispanic

 Tertile 1 < 9.9%, n = 25

26.8%

9.3%

9.4%

13.2%

 Tertile 2 ≥ 9.9% and < 24.4%, n = 25

29.7%

11.1%

6.6%

15.8%

 Tertile 3 >24.4%, n = 24

27.1%

8.4%

6.8%

15.1%

Median household income

 Tertile 1 < $51,298, n = 24

27.1%

10.0%

6.1%

14.2%

 Tertile 2 ≥ $51,298 and < $77,528, n = 25

29.8%

9.4%

9.7%

16.2%

 Tertile 3 ≥ $77,528, n = 25

26.8%

9.5%

6.9%

13.6%

Dispensary type

 Medical and recreational, n = 46

27.0%

8.9%

7.4%

14.6%

 Recreational only, n = 28

29.4%

10.8%

7.9%

14.8%

  1. Data were collected for the entire year of 2020. Analysis was conducted at the dispensary level. Data from one social media account could be used for multiple dispensaries if that account represented multiple retail locations. Linear regression models were used to examine differences in non-compliance outcomes by dispensary neighborhood race/ethnicity and income as well as dispensary type. Additionally, adjusted regression models that included neighborhood income tertiles, race/ethnicity tertiles, and dispensary type were used. Pairwise t-tests were employed to compare means across tertile groups for models with income and race/ethnicity tertiles. p-values were adjusted for multiple comparisons using the Bonferroni method. None of the differences in means were statistically significant at the 5% significance level